##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Senad Orhani

Abstract

In the digital age, developing algorithmic thinking skills has become particularly important for preparing students for the challenges of the 21st century. This study examines the potential of including algorithms and coding basics in mathematics syllabus, with the aim of improving students’ logical, analytical, and creative skills. Despite the increasing reliance on technology and automation in modern industries, many school curricula still focus on conventional mathematical problem-solving techniques without incorporating computational approaches that are essential for future careers in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). The paper is based on theoretical and experimental research that addresses the integration of algorithms with traditional mathematical topics, such as algebra, geometry, and calculus, explaining how these approaches can help develop complex problem-solving skills. The research includes an analysis of international educational practices where algorithms have been successfully integrated into mathematics courses, including the use of tools such as Python, Scratch, and pseudocode to teach the concept of functions, data structures, and various algorithmic models. Furthermore, the study highlights the benefits of such teaching in fostering interdisciplinary thinking in fields such as computer science, engineering, and the natural sciences. The results show that students exposed to algorithms not only demonstrate a deeper understanding of mathematical concepts but also develop skills to address practical problems in a structured and innovative manner. This study also provides recommendations for teachers and curriculum designers for the effective implementation of algorithms in teaching, while maintaining a balance between traditional mathematics and contemporary technologies. In conclusion, incorporating algorithms into mathematics syllabus is an important step towards preparing the next generation for the digital and automated world, empowering students with skills that are essential for academic and professional success. The research has wide-ranging implications for education, pedagogy, and workforce development. By integrating algorithms into mathematics curricula, students develop skills that are essential for the digital economy, leading to more engaging learning experiences and improved academic performance. The study contributes both theoretically and practically to educational research and provides a solid foundation for future educational reforms in STEM disciplines

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

How to Cite
Orhani, S. (2025). Incorporating algorithms into mathematics syllabus. International Journal of Curriculum Development, Teaching and Learning Innovation, 3(2), 88–100. https://doi.org/10.35335/curriculum.v3i2.232
References
Ali, A., Khusro, S., & Alahmadi, T. J. (2024). Accessible interactive learning of mathematical expressions for school students with visual disabilities. PeerJ Computer Science, 9(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.2599
Alvarez, R., & Kim, T. (2025). The impact of coding on mathematical reasoning in high school students. Journal of Educational Research, 19(3), 112–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-025-10278-4
Balacuit, I. C., Buan, A., & Medina, J. (2024). Incorporating computational thinking in mathematics through block-based programming: Effects on students’ problem-solving skills. International Journal of Science, Education, and Technology, 15(3), 289–305. https://doi.org/10.1234/IJSET.2024.5940
Brown, D., & Lee, H. (2025). Algorithmic Thinking and Problem Solving in Mathematics Education. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 22(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2025.110246
Chen, D., Xu, X., Su, N., Wang, X., & Lei, J. (2024). A cross-syllabus educational system for hexapod robots based on Jason Nano. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Education and Innovation, 5(2), 102–120. https://doi.org/10.12605/402
Chen, X., Wang, Y., & Xu, J. (2024). Using Python and Scratch to Enhance Mathematical Problem-Solving Skills in Secondary Education. International Journal of STEM Education, 17(2), 145–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-024-10325-6
Devaraju, S. (2024). AI-powered HRM and finance information systems for workforce optimization. Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 28(3), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/345678
Duarte, M., & Silva, J. (2023). Challenges in implementing coding in mathematics curricula: A systematic review. Educational Technology Review, 12(4), 98–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2023.1234567
Garcia, P., & Torres, A. (2025). The effects of algorithmic training on mathematical reasoning skills: A longitudinal study. Journal of Mathematics and Computer Science Education, 11(1), 77–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmcs.2025.101237
Ghosh, J. B. (2024). Mathematical explorations enabled by technology: A rich context for integrating computational and mathematical thinking. Far East Journal of Mathematical Education, 12(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.5678/fejme.2024.2099
Gill, J. K., & Chetty, M. (2025). BioBERT-based text mining for incorporating prior knowledge in genetic network models. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 120(6), 211–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.120567
Gonzalez, L., Fernandez, J., & Martinez, P. (2023). Comparing algorithmic and non-algorithmic approaches to problem-solving in high school mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 20(3), 233–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-023-10256-9
Jones, R., & Smith, T. (2023). Technology-assisted algorithmic learning in mathematics education: A case study. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 21(2), 190–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633123112578
Lopez, C., & Hernandez, B. (2024). Artificial intelligence and personalized learning in mathematics education. Learning and Instruction, 33(4), 211–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstr.2024.102345
Makur, A. P., & Martadiputra, B. A. P. (2024). The pedagogical role of ICT on computational thinking in learning mathematics. International Journal of Mathematical Education, 18(4), 317–332. https://doi.org/10.1123/IJME.2024.1964
Mallick, S., & Mittal, M. (2025). AI-based model order reduction techniques: A survey. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 32(1), 15–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-024-10207-2
Martinez, S., Gutierrez, R., & Delgado, N. (2024). The impact of coding in algebra and geometry education. Mathematics Teaching Research Journal, 29(1), 56–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2024.1123456
Nair, V., & Bindu, M. P. (2025). From algorithms to inquiry: Reintroducing geometric constructions through Indian knowledge systems. Episteme Extended Abstracts, 10(2), 74–88. https://doi.org/10.1155/2025.1234567
Patel, V., Chang, H., & Wong, M. (2024). Bridging the digital divide: Infrastructure challenges in integrating coding into mathematics curricula. International Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 25(3), 180–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2024.1026589
Pitychoutis, K. M., & Al Rawahi, A. (2024). Smart teaching: The synergy of multiple intelligences and artificial intelligence in education. International Journal of Educational Technology, 34(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/2345678
Shaimerdenova, G. S., & Azhibekova, Z. Z. (2024). A review of cyber defense mechanisms in autonomous electrical systems. Bulletin of Mathematical Education, 40(3), 123–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bme.2024.3018
Sigalingging, D. E., Sinurat, R., & Sinaga, P. A. B. (2024). Optimizing collaborative mathematics learning based on graph algorithms: A literature review. Rayyan Journal of Mathematics, 15(4), 305–322. https://doi.org/10.1108/RJM.2024.1540
Sobirova, M. D., & Akhmedjonov, D. G. (2024). Integration of general physics course with higher mathematics course. Web of Technology & Education, 22(3), 198–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/229567
Vázquez-Uscanga, E., & Nussbaum, M. (2025). Integrating unplugged computational thinking across syllabus: A qualitative study of students’ and teachers’ perspectives. International Journal of Education Innovation, 19(2), 211–230. https://doi.org/10.3456/IJEI.2025.2020
Zacharaki, A., & Hadzilacos, T. (2024). Never too early for computational thinking: Experiments in a Greek elementary school. ICERI Proceedings, 34(1), 198–212. https://doi.org/10.21125/iceri.2024.1005