Development of an Advance Organizer Learning Model Based on Mind Maps to Increase the Meaningfulness of High School Student Learning in Pangkep Regency
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
Based advance organizer learning model (PAO PaPi Model) for senior high school students. The research question is whether the development of PAO PaPi model is valid in terms of the theoretical basis and learning model components. The research subjects were 33 students in Senior High School 20 Pangkep, Indonesia. The development procedure of PAO Papi Model was carried out by referring to the development model of Plomp [1] which consists of five stages, namely: (1) investigation, (2) design, (3) realization / construction, (4) testing, evaluation and revision, and (5) implementation. The research product is the PAO PaPi Model. The component model developed refers to Joyce, et al. [2]. Characteristics of the developed model refer to Arend (2012), and product quality criteria refer to Nieeven (2007). Validation data analysis refers to Nurdin (2007) and Asdar (2013). The instrument reliability percentage used the concept of percentage of agreements by Grinnell (1988) in Nurdin (2007). The results showed that the PAO PaPi model was valid in terms of the supporting theories and components of the model
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Asdar, Ahsanul Khaer. 2013. “Pengembangan Perangkat Asesmen Alternatif Pada Pembelajaran Dimensi Tiga Setting Kooperatif Pada Siswa Kelas XI SMK. Tesis tidak diterbitkan. Makassar: UNM.
Depdiknas. (2007). UU Sisdiknas No 20. Jakarta: Pusat Kurikulum, Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Depdiknas.
Joyce, B., Weil, M., & Calhoun, E. (1992). Models Of Teaching (Model-Model Pengajaran). Jakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
Nieven, N. 2007. Formative Evaluation in Educational Design Research. In: Plomp and Nieven. 2007. An Introduction to Educational Design Research. Proceedings of the seminar conducted at the East China Normal University, Shanghai (PR China), November 23-26, 2007
Nurdin. 2007. Model Pembelajaran Matematika yang Membutuhkan Metakognitif untuk Menguasai Bahan Ajar. Disertasi. Tidak Diterbitkan. Surabaya: PPs Universitas Negeri Surabaya.
Ni, L.B. 2016. Advance Organizer: Cognitive Instructional Strategy. International Juornal of Computer Networks and Wireless Communication, 6(12): 53-57.
Oloyede, O.I. 2011. A Meta-analysis of Effects of the Advance Organizers on Acknowledgment and Retention of Senior secondary School (SSS) Chemistry. International Journal Education Science. Vol. 3 (2):129-135.
Panggabean, D. D. & Suyanti, R. D. 2012. Analisis Pemahaman Konsep Awal dan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Bidang Studi Fisika Menggunakan Model Pembelajaran Advance Organizer dan Model Pembelajaran Direct Instruction. Jurnal Online Pendidikan Fisika.Vol.1(2):13- 20.
Aktivitas Dan Hasil Belajar Siswa Pokok Bahasan Koloid. Journal of Innovative Science Education. Vol. 1 (1): 29-35.
Rusman. 2010. Model-Model Pembelajaran Mengembangkan Profesionalisme Guru. Bandung: PT. Slavin, R. E. (2015). Cooperative Learning Teori, Riset, dan Praktik. Bandung: Nusa Media.
Uzzaman, T., Choudhary, F.R, & Qamar, A.M. 2015. Advance Organizer Help to Enhance Learning and Retention. International Journal of Humanities Social Sciences and Education (IJHSSE), 2(3): 45-53.
Slavin, R. E. (2015). Cooperative Learning Teori, Riset, dan Praktik. Bandung: Nusa Media.
Uzzaman, T., Choudhary, F.R, & Qamar, A.M. 2015. Advance Organizer Help to Enhance Learning and Retention. International Journal of Humanities Social Sciences and Education (IJHSSE), 2(3): 45-53.
Yalcin, S.A., Turgut, U., Buyukkasap, E. 2009. The Effect of Project Based Learning on Science Undergraduates’ Learning of Electricity, Attitude towards Physics and Scientific Process Skills. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences. Vol. 1 (1): 81-105.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.