Analysis of cohesive devices in greta thunberg’s speech
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
Cohesive devices are essential for creating a well-structured text. They have multiple purposes and should be handled with clarity to avoid misunderstandings and maintain their comprehensibility. This study highlights cohesive devices in Greta Thunberg’s speech entitled Blah Blah Blah delivered at the Pre-COP26 Youth4Climate 2021 event, utilizing theories by Halliday and Hasan (1976), Scinto (1983), and Hartnett (1986). The research examines the types and functions of grammatical and lexical cohesion in Thunberg’s speech, as well as the cohesiveness degree in the speech text. Using a qualitative descriptive research design, the study discovers 55 sentences that comprise different coherent devices. The results showed grammatical cohesion (references, substitutions, and conjunctions) and lexical cohesion (repetitions, synonyms, superordinate, and collocations). The most common type of grammatical cohesion observed is personal reference, which serves to prevent redundancy and develop connections within the text. The primary kind of lexical cohesion identified is repetition, which serves to highlight key terms and ensure the continuity of the theme. The speech demonstrates a very high level of grammatical cohesiveness and medium level of lexical cohesiveness.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Alves, F., & Schmidt, L. (2022). Editorial: Climate change and society. Frontiers in Environmental Science and Frontiers in Communication, 1-4.
Amaelia, F., & Maulidhawati, R. (2021). Grammatical Cohesion Found on the Web Blog Diary Report of Students Teaching Practice Overseas in Universitas PGRI Semarang: A Study of Discourse Analysis. The 1stUndergraduate Conference on Applied Linguistics, Linguistics, and Literature, 245-252.
Arifiani, D. M. (2016). An Analysis of Grammatical and Lexical Cohesion Analysis in Emma Watson’s Speech Text On Gender Equality.
Cresswell, J. W. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th ed). SAGE Publications.
Halliday, M., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Routledge.
Hartnett, C. G. (196). Functional Approaches to Writing Research Perspectives. London: Frances Pinter.
Hassen, R. (2015). Discourse as Medium of Knowledge: Transmission of Knowledge. Journal of Education and Practice, 119-128.
Hewitt, S. (2009). Discourse Analysis and Public Policy Research. Centre for Rural Economy Discussion Paper Series No. 24, 1-16.
Leedy, P. D., Ormrod, J. E., & Johnson, L. R. (2021). Practical Research: Planning and Design. London: Pearson.
Mao, F. (2021). A Re-Analysis of Cohesion and Coherence. International Journal of Social Sciences and Management Review, 37-45.
McLeod, S., & McCormack, J. (2015). Introduction to speech, language and literacy. Melbourne, Australia: Oxford University Press.
Paltridge, B. (2012). Discourse Analysis: An Introduction (2nd ed.). London: Continuum.
Saldana, J. (2013). The Coding Manual For Qualitative Researchers, 2nd edition. London: Sage.
Scinto, L. F. (1983). The development of text production. Dalam J. Fine, & R. O. Freedle, Developmental Issues in Discourse (hal. 225-268). Noorwood, New Jersey: ABLEX Publishing Corporation.
Slagell, A. (2009). Public Speaking” 21st Century Communication: A Reference Handbook. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publication.
Zainiah, N. (2018). An Analysis on Grammatical Cohesion Found in Undergraduate Thesis of English Education Department Students at State Institute for Islamic Studies of Metro.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.