The Influence of Interactive Learning Media on Students' Learning Interest in Biology Subjects in Junior High Schools
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Published:
Jul 31, 2024
Keywords:
Interactive Learning Media, Student Engagement, Biology Education, Academic Performance, Junior High Schools
Section
Articles
Statistics Article
Article View : 17 Times
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
This research investigates the influence of interactive learning media on students' learning interest in biology subjects within junior high schools. Utilizing a mixed-methods approach, the study combines quantitative assessments of academic performance through pre-tests and post-tests with qualitative data from student interviews and teacher focus groups. The findings reveal that students exposed to interactive learning tools, such as simulations and virtual labs, exhibit significantly higher levels of engagement and motivation compared to those taught through traditional methods. Enhanced comprehension of complex biological concepts and improved academic outcomes are notable results of this engagement. Furthermore, qualitative insights highlight the role of interactive media in fostering collaborative learning environments and empowering students to take an active role in their education. The study underscores the implications for educational practice and policy, advocating for the integration of interactive learning media into biology curricula and the necessity of professional development for educators. These findings contribute to the growing body of evidence supporting the effective use of technology in enhancing student learning experiences, ultimately promoting a deeper interest in science education among junior high school students.
Interactive Learning Media;
Student Engagement
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
How to Cite
Mariati, S. L. (2024). The Influence of Interactive Learning Media on Students’ Learning Interest in Biology Subjects in Junior High Schools. International Journal of Curriculum Development, Teaching and Learning Innovation, 2(3), 127–135. Retrieved from https://trigin.pelnus.ac.id/index.php/Curriculum/article/view/189
References
Abdullah, S. (2009). Whose Education? Whose Nation? Exploring the Role of Government Primary School Textbooks of Bangladesh in Colonialist Forms of Marginalization and Exclusion of Poor and Ethnic Minority Children.
Beeland Jr, W. D. (2002). Student engagement, visual learning and technology: can interactive whiteboards help?
Blasco-Arcas, L., Buil, I., Hernández-Ortega, B., & Sese, F. J. (2013). Using clickers in class. The role of interactivity, active collaborative learning and engagement in learning performance. Computers & Education, 62, 102–110.
Buckley, B. C. (2000). Interactive multimedia and model-based learning in biology. International Journal of Science Education, 22(9), 895–935.
Sihotang, J. (2019). Implementation of Gray Level Transformation Method for Sharping 2D Images. INFOKUM, 8(1, Desembe), 16-19.
Sihotang, J. (2020). Analysis of service satisfaction level using rough set algorithm. Infokum, 8(2, Juni), 55-56.
Sihotang, J. (2020). Analysis Of Shortest Path Determination By Utilizing Breadth First Search Algorithm. Jurnal Info Sains: Informatika dan Sains, 10(2), 1-5.
Sihotang, J., Panjaitan, E. S., & Yunis, R. (2020). Evaluation of Information Technology Governance by Using CobIT 5Framework at Higher Education. Jurnal Mantik, 4(3), 2194-2203.
Amri, S., & Sihotang, J. (2023). Impact of Poverty Reduction Programs on Healthcare Access in Remote Ar-eas: Fostering
Community Development for Sustainable Health. Law and Economics, 17(3), 170-185.
Castañeda, L., & Williamson, B. (2021). Assembling new toolboxes of methods and theories for innovative critical research on educational technology. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 10(1), 1–14.
Cleveland, L. M., Olimpo, J. T., & DeChenne-Peters, S. E. (2017). Investigating the relationship between instructors’ use of active-learning strategies and students’ conceptual understanding and affective changes in introductory biology: A comparison of two active-learning environments. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 16(2), ar19.
Lazarowitz, R., & Bloch, I. (2005). Awareness of societal issues among high school biology teachers teaching genetics. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14, 437–457.
Li, M.-C., & Tsai, C.-C. (2013). Game-based learning in science education: A review of relevant research. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22, 877–898.
Lombardi, D., Shipley, T. F., & Astronomy Team Chemistry Team, Engineering Team, Geography Team, Geoscience Team, and Physics Team, B. T. (2021). The curious construct of active learning. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 22(1), 8–43.
Sihotang, J., Alesha, A., Batubara, J., Gorat, S. E., & Panjaitan, F. S. (2022). A hybrid approach for adaptive fuzzy networkpartitioning and rule generation using rough set theory: Improving data-driven decision making through
accurate and interpretable rules. International Journal of Enterprise Modelling, 16(1), 12-22.
Sihotang, J. (2023). Optimization of Inventory Ordering Decision in Retail Business using Exponential Smoothing
Approach and Decision Support System. International Journal of Mechanical Computational and Manufacturing
Research, 12(2), 46-52.
Sihotang, J. (2023). Analysis Of the Differences in The Use of Zoom and Google Meet in Learning at Putra Abadi Langkat University. Instal: Jurnal Komputer, 15(02), 474-479.
Lu, S.-J., & Liu, Y.-C. (2015). Integrating augmented reality technology to enhance children’s learning in marine education. Environmental Education Research, 21(4), 525–541.
Makuru, B., & Jita, T. (2022). Information and Communication Technology Practices in Biology Teaching in Lesotho High Schools. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 12(7).
McKnight, K., O’Malley, K., Ruzic, R., Horsley, M. K., Franey, J. J., & Bassett, K. (2016). Teaching in a digital age: How educators use technology to improve student learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 48(3), 194–211.
O’Shea, S., Stone, C., & Delahunty, J. (2015). “I ‘feel’like I am at university even though I am online.” Exploring how students narrate their engagement with higher education institutions in an online learning environment. Distance Education, 36(1), 41–58.
Pashler, H., McDaniel, M., Rohrer, D., & Bjork, R. (2008). Learning styles: Concepts and evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 9(3), 105–119.
Raes, J., & Bork, P. (2008). Molecular eco-systems biology: towards an understanding of community function. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 6(9), 693–699.
Ramaley, J. A., & Zia, L. (2005). The real versus the possible: Closing the gaps in engagement and learning. EDUCAUSE.
Reuter, J. J. (2005). Using the BioDatamation Strategy to Learn Introductory College Biology: Value-Added Effects on Selected Students’ Conceptual Understanding and Conceptual Integration of the Processes of Photosynthesis and Celluar Respiration. Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College.
Roth, W., Bowen, G. M., & McGinn, M. K. (1999). Differences in graph‐related practices between high school biology textbooks and scientific ecology journals. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 36(9), 977–1019.
Satayev, M., Balta, N., Shaymerdenovna, I. R., Fernández-Cézar, R., & Alcaraz-Mármol, G. (2022). Content and language integrated learning implementation through team teaching in biology lessons: a quasi-experimental design with university students. Frontiers in Education, 7, 867447.
Silverthorn, D. U., Thorn, P. M., & Svinicki, M. D. (2006). It’s difficult to change the way we teach: lessons from the Integrative Themes in Physiology curriculum module project. Advances in Physiology Education, 30(4), 204–214.
Vinsensia, D., Amri, S., Sihotang, J., & Sihotang, H. T. (2024). New Method for Identification and Response to Infectious
Disease Patterns Based on Comprehensive Health Service Data. MATRIK: Jurnal Manajemen, Teknik Informatika dan Rekayasa Komputer, 23(3), 581-590.
Sihotang, H. T., Riandari, F., & Sihotang, J. (2024). Graph-based Exploration for Mining and Optimization of Yields
(GEMOY Method). Jurnal Teknik Informatika CIT Medicom, 16(2), 70-81.
Sihotang, J., Amri, S., & Vinsensia, D. (2024). Exploring the intersection of HIV/AIDS knowledge and rapid testing attitudes
in higher education: A student perspective. Community Service and Applied Research, 1(1), 18-29.
Sihotang, J., & Manalu, A. (2024). Strategi Pengawasan Orang Tua dalam Mengelola Waktu Bermain Gadget Anak di Desa Pancurbatu. Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Nauli, 2(2), 65-72.
Simbolon, R., Sihotang, W., & Sihotang, J. (2024). Tapping Ocean Potential: Strategies for integrating tidal and wave energy into national power grids. GEMOY: Green Energy Management and Optimization Yields, 1(1), 49-65.
Sinatra, G. M., Heddy, B. C., & Lombardi, D. (2015). The challenges of defining and measuring student engagement in science. In Educational psychologist (Vol. 50, Issue 1, pp. 1–13). Taylor & Francis.
Sinatra, G. M., Southerland, S. A., McConaughy, F., & Demastes, J. W. (2003). Intentions and beliefs in students’ understanding and acceptance of biological evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 40(5), 510–528.
Tanner, K., & Allen, D. (2006). Approaches to biology teaching and learning: On integrating pedagogical training into the graduate experiences of future science faculty. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 5(1), 1–6.
Taraban, R., Box, C., Myers, R., Pollard, R., & Bowen, C. W. (2007). Effects of active‐learning experiences on achievement, attitudes, and behaviors in high school biology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 44(7), 960–979.
Wei, C. A., & Woodin, T. (2011). Undergraduate research experiences in biology: alternatives to the apprenticeship model. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 10(2), 123–131.
Willingham, D. T. (2021). Why don’t students like school?: A cognitive scientist answers questions about how the mind works and what it means for the classroom. John Wiley & Sons.
Beeland Jr, W. D. (2002). Student engagement, visual learning and technology: can interactive whiteboards help?
Blasco-Arcas, L., Buil, I., Hernández-Ortega, B., & Sese, F. J. (2013). Using clickers in class. The role of interactivity, active collaborative learning and engagement in learning performance. Computers & Education, 62, 102–110.
Buckley, B. C. (2000). Interactive multimedia and model-based learning in biology. International Journal of Science Education, 22(9), 895–935.
Sihotang, J. (2019). Implementation of Gray Level Transformation Method for Sharping 2D Images. INFOKUM, 8(1, Desembe), 16-19.
Sihotang, J. (2020). Analysis of service satisfaction level using rough set algorithm. Infokum, 8(2, Juni), 55-56.
Sihotang, J. (2020). Analysis Of Shortest Path Determination By Utilizing Breadth First Search Algorithm. Jurnal Info Sains: Informatika dan Sains, 10(2), 1-5.
Sihotang, J., Panjaitan, E. S., & Yunis, R. (2020). Evaluation of Information Technology Governance by Using CobIT 5Framework at Higher Education. Jurnal Mantik, 4(3), 2194-2203.
Amri, S., & Sihotang, J. (2023). Impact of Poverty Reduction Programs on Healthcare Access in Remote Ar-eas: Fostering
Community Development for Sustainable Health. Law and Economics, 17(3), 170-185.
Castañeda, L., & Williamson, B. (2021). Assembling new toolboxes of methods and theories for innovative critical research on educational technology. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 10(1), 1–14.
Cleveland, L. M., Olimpo, J. T., & DeChenne-Peters, S. E. (2017). Investigating the relationship between instructors’ use of active-learning strategies and students’ conceptual understanding and affective changes in introductory biology: A comparison of two active-learning environments. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 16(2), ar19.
Lazarowitz, R., & Bloch, I. (2005). Awareness of societal issues among high school biology teachers teaching genetics. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14, 437–457.
Li, M.-C., & Tsai, C.-C. (2013). Game-based learning in science education: A review of relevant research. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22, 877–898.
Lombardi, D., Shipley, T. F., & Astronomy Team Chemistry Team, Engineering Team, Geography Team, Geoscience Team, and Physics Team, B. T. (2021). The curious construct of active learning. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 22(1), 8–43.
Sihotang, J., Alesha, A., Batubara, J., Gorat, S. E., & Panjaitan, F. S. (2022). A hybrid approach for adaptive fuzzy networkpartitioning and rule generation using rough set theory: Improving data-driven decision making through
accurate and interpretable rules. International Journal of Enterprise Modelling, 16(1), 12-22.
Sihotang, J. (2023). Optimization of Inventory Ordering Decision in Retail Business using Exponential Smoothing
Approach and Decision Support System. International Journal of Mechanical Computational and Manufacturing
Research, 12(2), 46-52.
Sihotang, J. (2023). Analysis Of the Differences in The Use of Zoom and Google Meet in Learning at Putra Abadi Langkat University. Instal: Jurnal Komputer, 15(02), 474-479.
Lu, S.-J., & Liu, Y.-C. (2015). Integrating augmented reality technology to enhance children’s learning in marine education. Environmental Education Research, 21(4), 525–541.
Makuru, B., & Jita, T. (2022). Information and Communication Technology Practices in Biology Teaching in Lesotho High Schools. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 12(7).
McKnight, K., O’Malley, K., Ruzic, R., Horsley, M. K., Franey, J. J., & Bassett, K. (2016). Teaching in a digital age: How educators use technology to improve student learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 48(3), 194–211.
O’Shea, S., Stone, C., & Delahunty, J. (2015). “I ‘feel’like I am at university even though I am online.” Exploring how students narrate their engagement with higher education institutions in an online learning environment. Distance Education, 36(1), 41–58.
Pashler, H., McDaniel, M., Rohrer, D., & Bjork, R. (2008). Learning styles: Concepts and evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 9(3), 105–119.
Raes, J., & Bork, P. (2008). Molecular eco-systems biology: towards an understanding of community function. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 6(9), 693–699.
Ramaley, J. A., & Zia, L. (2005). The real versus the possible: Closing the gaps in engagement and learning. EDUCAUSE.
Reuter, J. J. (2005). Using the BioDatamation Strategy to Learn Introductory College Biology: Value-Added Effects on Selected Students’ Conceptual Understanding and Conceptual Integration of the Processes of Photosynthesis and Celluar Respiration. Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College.
Roth, W., Bowen, G. M., & McGinn, M. K. (1999). Differences in graph‐related practices between high school biology textbooks and scientific ecology journals. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 36(9), 977–1019.
Satayev, M., Balta, N., Shaymerdenovna, I. R., Fernández-Cézar, R., & Alcaraz-Mármol, G. (2022). Content and language integrated learning implementation through team teaching in biology lessons: a quasi-experimental design with university students. Frontiers in Education, 7, 867447.
Silverthorn, D. U., Thorn, P. M., & Svinicki, M. D. (2006). It’s difficult to change the way we teach: lessons from the Integrative Themes in Physiology curriculum module project. Advances in Physiology Education, 30(4), 204–214.
Vinsensia, D., Amri, S., Sihotang, J., & Sihotang, H. T. (2024). New Method for Identification and Response to Infectious
Disease Patterns Based on Comprehensive Health Service Data. MATRIK: Jurnal Manajemen, Teknik Informatika dan Rekayasa Komputer, 23(3), 581-590.
Sihotang, H. T., Riandari, F., & Sihotang, J. (2024). Graph-based Exploration for Mining and Optimization of Yields
(GEMOY Method). Jurnal Teknik Informatika CIT Medicom, 16(2), 70-81.
Sihotang, J., Amri, S., & Vinsensia, D. (2024). Exploring the intersection of HIV/AIDS knowledge and rapid testing attitudes
in higher education: A student perspective. Community Service and Applied Research, 1(1), 18-29.
Sihotang, J., & Manalu, A. (2024). Strategi Pengawasan Orang Tua dalam Mengelola Waktu Bermain Gadget Anak di Desa Pancurbatu. Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Nauli, 2(2), 65-72.
Simbolon, R., Sihotang, W., & Sihotang, J. (2024). Tapping Ocean Potential: Strategies for integrating tidal and wave energy into national power grids. GEMOY: Green Energy Management and Optimization Yields, 1(1), 49-65.
Sinatra, G. M., Heddy, B. C., & Lombardi, D. (2015). The challenges of defining and measuring student engagement in science. In Educational psychologist (Vol. 50, Issue 1, pp. 1–13). Taylor & Francis.
Sinatra, G. M., Southerland, S. A., McConaughy, F., & Demastes, J. W. (2003). Intentions and beliefs in students’ understanding and acceptance of biological evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 40(5), 510–528.
Tanner, K., & Allen, D. (2006). Approaches to biology teaching and learning: On integrating pedagogical training into the graduate experiences of future science faculty. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 5(1), 1–6.
Taraban, R., Box, C., Myers, R., Pollard, R., & Bowen, C. W. (2007). Effects of active‐learning experiences on achievement, attitudes, and behaviors in high school biology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 44(7), 960–979.
Wei, C. A., & Woodin, T. (2011). Undergraduate research experiences in biology: alternatives to the apprenticeship model. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 10(2), 123–131.
Willingham, D. T. (2021). Why don’t students like school?: A cognitive scientist answers questions about how the mind works and what it means for the classroom. John Wiley & Sons.
Copyright and Licensing
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.