Contextual learning in the education unit level curriculum faces obstacles
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Published:
Nov 30, 2022
Keywords:
Contextual teaching, Contextual learning, Education Unit Level Curriculum
Section
Articles
Statistics Article
Article View : 302 Times
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
This study examined Indonesia's education unit level adoption of the Contextual Teaching and Learning approach and its supportive and limiting elements. In the Education Unit Level Curriculum, Contextual Teaching and Learning works well. To make learning more relevant and the Education Unit Level Curriculum implementation successful, implementation must be context-based. The Unit Level Curriculum must match students, educators, learning media, the environment, and their natural traits. Because this must follow the method to attain educational goals. Thus, Contextual Teaching and Learning depends on the Education Unit Level Curriculum. To support and balance each other, the Unit Level Curriculum socialization process for instructors must function properly. If the Education Unit Level Curriculum implementation goes successfully, the Contextual Teaching and Learning approach will be the same
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
How to Cite
Amar, T. D., & Haning, S. (2022). Contextual learning in the education unit level curriculum faces obstacles. International Journal of Curriculum Development, Teaching and Learning Innovation, 1(1), 7–12. https://doi.org/10.35335/curriculum.v1i1.52
References
Albanese, M. (2000). Problem‐based learning: why curricula are likely to show little effect on knowledge and clinical skills. Medical Education, 34(9), 729–738.
Anzul, M., Ely, M., Freidman, T., Garner, D., & McCormack-Steinmetz, A. (2003). Doing qualitative research: Circles within circles. Routledge.
Belasen, A. T., & Rufer, R. (2007). BUILDING A COMPETENCY-BASED MBA FROM THE GROUND UP: CURRICULUM DESIGN AND PROGRAM DELIVERY. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2007(1), 1–6.
Berns, R. G., & Erickson, P. M. (2001). Contextual Teaching and Learning: Preparing Students for the New Economy. The Highlight Zone: Research@ Work No. 5.
Boettcher, J., & Conrad, R.-M. (1999). Faculty guide for moving teaching and learning to the web.
Brantlinger, E., Jimenez, R., Klingner, J., Pugach, M., & Richardson, V. (2005). Qualitative studies in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 195–207.
Choudhuri, D., Glauser, A., & Peregoy, J. (2004). Guidelines for writing a qualitative manuscript for the Journal of Counseling & Development. Journal of Counseling & Development, 82(4), 443–446.
Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. (2007). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. John Wiley & Sons.
Dolmans, D. H. J. M., De Grave, W., Wolfhagen, I. H. A. P., & Van Der Vleuten, C. P. M. (2005). Problem‐based learning: Future challenges for educational practice and research. Medical Education, 39(7), 732–741.
Falender, C. A., & Shafranske, E. P. (2007). Competence in competency-based supervision practice: Construct and application. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 38(3), 232.
Farida, R. (2016). Upaya peningkatan keterampilan membaca siswa kelas II Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Nurul Ahsan kota Depok melalui penerapan contextual teaching and learning. Fakultas Ilmu Tarbiyah dan Keguruan UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta.
Hidayati, A. N. (2007). Studi komparasi metode pembelajaran problem based learning (pbl) dan contextual teaching and learning (ctl) terhadap pencapaian prestasi belajar ekonomi siswa kelas XI SMA Muhammadiyah 2 Surakarta tahun ajaran 2006/2007.
Jang, S., & Kim, N. (2004). Transition from high school to higher education and work in Korea, from the competency-based education perspective. International Journal of Educational Development, 24(6), 691–703.
Johnson, E. B. (2002). Contextual teaching and learning: What it is and why it’s here to stay. Corwin Press.
Kurikulum, P., & Nasional, D. P. (2007). Naskah Akademik Kebijakan Kurikulum Mata Pelajaran. 1–32.
Levy, D. (2006). Qualitative methodology and grounded theory in property research. Pacific Rim Property Research Journal, 12(4), 369–388.
Mans, M. (2002). Playing the Music—Comparing Performance of Children’s Song and Dance in Traditional and Contemporary Namibian Education. In The arts in children’s lives (pp. 71–86). Springer.
Mantzoukas, S. (2005). The inclusion of bias in reflective and reflexive research: A necessary prerequisite for securing validity. Journal of Research in Nursing, 10(3), 279–295.
Nasional, D. P. (2007). Naskah Akademik Kajian Kebijakan Kurikulum Mata Pelajaran Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial (IPS). Jakarta: Badan Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Pusat Kurikulum.
Nawang Palupi, M., Hatta, M., Pramowardhany Nilla, E., Widiarti, E., Tsani, N., Ratnasari, R., H Matanggui, J., Widiyanto, G., Ghozi, A., & Nugroho, T. (2007). Ekspresi: media komunikasi dan informasi, 2007. In Ekspresi (Vol. 9, Issue V, pp. 1–47). PPPPTK Bahasa.
Nurhadi, B. Y., & Senduk, A. G. (2004). Pembelajaran kontekstual dan penerapannya dalam KBK. Malang: Universitas Negeri Malang Pres.
O’Sullivan, M. (2006). Lesson observation and quality in primary education as contextual teaching and learning processes. International Journal of Educational Development, 26(3), 246–260.
Polkinghorne, D. E. (2005). Language and meaning: Data collection in qualitative research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 137.
Puspita, D. (2004). Designing a set of English instructional listening materials for the first semester students of first grade of senior high school based on the competency-based curriculum. Yogyakarta: Universitas Sanata Dharma.
Rae, D. (2007). Connecting enterprise and graduate employability: challenges to the higher education culture and curriculum? Education+ Training.
RI, D. P. N. (2006). Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan (KTSP). Bahan Sosialisasi.
Ritonga, M. Z. F., & Surya, E. (2003). Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Siswa Dengan Menggunakan Model Pembelajaran Kontekstual. December.
Saleh, A. (2016). Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Siswa Dengan Menggunakan Model Contextual Teaching and Learning (Pada Mata Pelajaran PKn Kelas V) SDIT YASFI. Fakultas Ilmu Tarbiyah dan Keguruan UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta.
Seddon, T. (2001). National curriculum in Australia? A matter of politics, powerful knowledge and the regulation of learning. Pedagogy Culture and Society, 9(3), 307–331.
Selden, A., & Selden, J. (2003). Validations of proofs considered as texts: Can undergraduates tell whether an argument proves a theorem? Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34(1), 4–36.
Sihono, T. (2004). Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) sebagai model pembelajaran ekonomi dalam KBK. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Pendidikan, 1(1).
Smith, S. R. (1999). AMEE guide no. 14: outcome-based education: part 2-planning, implementing and evaluating a competency-based curriculum. Medical Teacher, 21(1), 15–22.
Sulistiyaningsih, E. (2016). Upaya Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Matematika Dengan Strategi Pembelajaran Inkuiri Pada Siswa Kelas V MI Asy-Syifa Pamulang Timur. Fakultas Ilmu Tarbiyah dan Keguruan UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta.
Sutcliffe, N., Chan, S. S., & Nakayama, M. (2005). A competency based MSIS curriculum. Journal of Information Systems Education, 16(3), 301–310.
Van der Vaart, W. (2004). The time-line as a device to enhance recall in standardized research interviews: A split ballot study. Journal of Official Statistics, 20(2), 301.
WULANDARI, F. (2007). PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN CONTEXTUAL TEACHING AND LEARNING DALAM PEMECAHANMASALAH MATEMATIKA TERHADAP PRESTASI BELAJAR SISWAEksperimen Pembelajaran matematika kelas I SLTP N 2 TRUCUK. Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
Anzul, M., Ely, M., Freidman, T., Garner, D., & McCormack-Steinmetz, A. (2003). Doing qualitative research: Circles within circles. Routledge.
Belasen, A. T., & Rufer, R. (2007). BUILDING A COMPETENCY-BASED MBA FROM THE GROUND UP: CURRICULUM DESIGN AND PROGRAM DELIVERY. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2007(1), 1–6.
Berns, R. G., & Erickson, P. M. (2001). Contextual Teaching and Learning: Preparing Students for the New Economy. The Highlight Zone: Research@ Work No. 5.
Boettcher, J., & Conrad, R.-M. (1999). Faculty guide for moving teaching and learning to the web.
Brantlinger, E., Jimenez, R., Klingner, J., Pugach, M., & Richardson, V. (2005). Qualitative studies in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 195–207.
Choudhuri, D., Glauser, A., & Peregoy, J. (2004). Guidelines for writing a qualitative manuscript for the Journal of Counseling & Development. Journal of Counseling & Development, 82(4), 443–446.
Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. (2007). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. John Wiley & Sons.
Dolmans, D. H. J. M., De Grave, W., Wolfhagen, I. H. A. P., & Van Der Vleuten, C. P. M. (2005). Problem‐based learning: Future challenges for educational practice and research. Medical Education, 39(7), 732–741.
Falender, C. A., & Shafranske, E. P. (2007). Competence in competency-based supervision practice: Construct and application. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 38(3), 232.
Farida, R. (2016). Upaya peningkatan keterampilan membaca siswa kelas II Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Nurul Ahsan kota Depok melalui penerapan contextual teaching and learning. Fakultas Ilmu Tarbiyah dan Keguruan UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta.
Hidayati, A. N. (2007). Studi komparasi metode pembelajaran problem based learning (pbl) dan contextual teaching and learning (ctl) terhadap pencapaian prestasi belajar ekonomi siswa kelas XI SMA Muhammadiyah 2 Surakarta tahun ajaran 2006/2007.
Jang, S., & Kim, N. (2004). Transition from high school to higher education and work in Korea, from the competency-based education perspective. International Journal of Educational Development, 24(6), 691–703.
Johnson, E. B. (2002). Contextual teaching and learning: What it is and why it’s here to stay. Corwin Press.
Kurikulum, P., & Nasional, D. P. (2007). Naskah Akademik Kebijakan Kurikulum Mata Pelajaran. 1–32.
Levy, D. (2006). Qualitative methodology and grounded theory in property research. Pacific Rim Property Research Journal, 12(4), 369–388.
Mans, M. (2002). Playing the Music—Comparing Performance of Children’s Song and Dance in Traditional and Contemporary Namibian Education. In The arts in children’s lives (pp. 71–86). Springer.
Mantzoukas, S. (2005). The inclusion of bias in reflective and reflexive research: A necessary prerequisite for securing validity. Journal of Research in Nursing, 10(3), 279–295.
Nasional, D. P. (2007). Naskah Akademik Kajian Kebijakan Kurikulum Mata Pelajaran Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial (IPS). Jakarta: Badan Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Pusat Kurikulum.
Nawang Palupi, M., Hatta, M., Pramowardhany Nilla, E., Widiarti, E., Tsani, N., Ratnasari, R., H Matanggui, J., Widiyanto, G., Ghozi, A., & Nugroho, T. (2007). Ekspresi: media komunikasi dan informasi, 2007. In Ekspresi (Vol. 9, Issue V, pp. 1–47). PPPPTK Bahasa.
Nurhadi, B. Y., & Senduk, A. G. (2004). Pembelajaran kontekstual dan penerapannya dalam KBK. Malang: Universitas Negeri Malang Pres.
O’Sullivan, M. (2006). Lesson observation and quality in primary education as contextual teaching and learning processes. International Journal of Educational Development, 26(3), 246–260.
Polkinghorne, D. E. (2005). Language and meaning: Data collection in qualitative research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 137.
Puspita, D. (2004). Designing a set of English instructional listening materials for the first semester students of first grade of senior high school based on the competency-based curriculum. Yogyakarta: Universitas Sanata Dharma.
Rae, D. (2007). Connecting enterprise and graduate employability: challenges to the higher education culture and curriculum? Education+ Training.
RI, D. P. N. (2006). Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan (KTSP). Bahan Sosialisasi.
Ritonga, M. Z. F., & Surya, E. (2003). Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Siswa Dengan Menggunakan Model Pembelajaran Kontekstual. December.
Saleh, A. (2016). Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Siswa Dengan Menggunakan Model Contextual Teaching and Learning (Pada Mata Pelajaran PKn Kelas V) SDIT YASFI. Fakultas Ilmu Tarbiyah dan Keguruan UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta.
Seddon, T. (2001). National curriculum in Australia? A matter of politics, powerful knowledge and the regulation of learning. Pedagogy Culture and Society, 9(3), 307–331.
Selden, A., & Selden, J. (2003). Validations of proofs considered as texts: Can undergraduates tell whether an argument proves a theorem? Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34(1), 4–36.
Sihono, T. (2004). Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) sebagai model pembelajaran ekonomi dalam KBK. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Pendidikan, 1(1).
Smith, S. R. (1999). AMEE guide no. 14: outcome-based education: part 2-planning, implementing and evaluating a competency-based curriculum. Medical Teacher, 21(1), 15–22.
Sulistiyaningsih, E. (2016). Upaya Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Matematika Dengan Strategi Pembelajaran Inkuiri Pada Siswa Kelas V MI Asy-Syifa Pamulang Timur. Fakultas Ilmu Tarbiyah dan Keguruan UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta.
Sutcliffe, N., Chan, S. S., & Nakayama, M. (2005). A competency based MSIS curriculum. Journal of Information Systems Education, 16(3), 301–310.
Van der Vaart, W. (2004). The time-line as a device to enhance recall in standardized research interviews: A split ballot study. Journal of Official Statistics, 20(2), 301.
WULANDARI, F. (2007). PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN CONTEXTUAL TEACHING AND LEARNING DALAM PEMECAHANMASALAH MATEMATIKA TERHADAP PRESTASI BELAJAR SISWAEksperimen Pembelajaran matematika kelas I SLTP N 2 TRUCUK. Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
Copyright and Licensing
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.